Baby boomer here. I’ve learned so much from Substack writers. I didn’t watch the news growing up, and still don’t. I didn’t want the horrors of the world affecting my outlook on life. Where will this end without Divine intervention?
I hear you, and let's not forget how they've taken a lame theory, evolution, and morphed it multiple times to fit their narratives. This is not science either; it is completely illogical, without any scientific evidence.
Evolution fails when confronted with irreducible complexity. Indeed, Darwin would have fits when asked about the mammalian eye. Herre is a related discussion:
Evolution was merely a way to "scientifically" justify atheism, and later Eugenics and Nazism. Their only answer to irreducible complexity is that the details have not yet been worked out, and besides, since believing in God is irrational, evolution is the only rational explanation.
They also shy away from the inherent intellectual design. i.e. There is more to a book than paper and ink. Some intelligence had to compose the words, right?
Amen, brother, and thanks for sharing the article.
Baby boomer here. I’ve learned so much from Substack writers. I didn’t watch the news growing up, and still don’t. I didn’t want the horrors of the world affecting my outlook on life. Where will this end without Divine intervention?
I hear you, and let's not forget how they've taken a lame theory, evolution, and morphed it multiple times to fit their narratives. This is not science either; it is completely illogical, without any scientific evidence.
Evolution fails when confronted with irreducible complexity. Indeed, Darwin would have fits when asked about the mammalian eye. Herre is a related discussion:
https://fredoneverything.org/razib-and-me-and-darwin-makes-three-and-some-insect-parts/#more-1678
Evolution was merely a way to "scientifically" justify atheism, and later Eugenics and Nazism. Their only answer to irreducible complexity is that the details have not yet been worked out, and besides, since believing in God is irrational, evolution is the only rational explanation.
They also shy away from the inherent intellectual design. i.e. There is more to a book than paper and ink. Some intelligence had to compose the words, right?
Well said.
Al--
Thanks. I wonder how many present-day scientists could even describe the scientific method (without Googling it first).